No mate. To remove … No mate. To remove a section of fence ,that the builder was happy to replace 7 scarf the tree into next door ,where by the wood was to stay ,was by far quicker than blocking the tree down to ground & risk destroying the fence if were up. Take into consderation the tower is on site at an hourly rate at my expense & there was other trees to get Down.
December 30th, 2009 | 10:50 pm
brettchop:
would of been … would of been faster to rope the tree down out of the tower than do the fence in?
steve clencie tree services felling a large gum around 70′
No mate. To remove …
No mate. To remove a section of fence ,that the builder was happy to replace 7 scarf the tree into next door ,where by the wood was to stay ,was by far quicker than blocking the tree down to ground & risk destroying the fence if were up. Take into consderation the tower is on site at an hourly rate at my expense & there was other trees to get Down.
would of been …
would of been faster to rope the tree down out of the tower than do the fence in?